Author |
Thread |
|
Pulse89
Average Member
Hungary
167 posts Joined: May, 2007
|
Posted - 2011/03/13 : 21:49:53
Hi !
Let me know what you guys think of it!!!
http://soundcloud.com/pulsehardcore/pulse-vision-control-original -Pulse-
__________________________________
http://soundcloud.com/pulsehardcore
Alert moderator
|
Warnman
Advanced Member
Germany
2,677 posts Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2011/03/13 : 22:11:08
I like it a lot! Maybe teasing the listeners simply by installing a short break before the main part sets in might sound better (1:08).
__________________________________
Ravers unite!
"Happy Hardcore: Love it... hate it... it's fun!" (Matt Stokes)
Alert moderator
|
DJ_FunDaBounce
Advanced Member
Colombia
2,001 posts Joined: Nov, 2001
|
Posted - 2011/03/13 : 23:32:46
I like the the main chord progression but I find that I need a bit more variation structure-wise to make it something worth coming back to. Just the buildups as variety ain't enough.
__________________________________
"Fun with a capital F-D-B!"
http://www.brightspeedrecordings.com/
Alert moderator
|
Pulse89
Average Member
Hungary
167 posts Joined: May, 2007
|
Posted - 2011/03/14 : 18:43:15
nice comments :D :D
Bump!!
__________________________________
http://soundcloud.com/pulsehardcore
Alert moderator
|
Audio Warfare
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,047 posts Joined: Mar, 2009
|
Posted - 2011/03/14 : 19:01:36
I like this mate. Have dropped some comments on SC too. :)
__________________________________
Listen to released and forthcoming Audio Warfare/Audio Weaponry tunes here:-
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare
Alert moderator
|
KittenNipples
Starting Member
United States Minor Outlying Islands
5 posts Joined: Mar, 2011
|
Posted - 2011/03/14 : 21:35:22
quote: Originally posted by Warnman:
I like it a lot! Maybe teasing the listeners simply by installing a short break before the main part sets in might sound better (1:08).
I totally agree, you have a great sound, but that little break and the beat kicking back in would get me so psyched! Wonderful tune though.
Alert moderator
|
H3RO
Junior Member
United States
145 posts Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2011/03/15 : 19:43:25
I like the idea of the track. There's nothing really special about it though. I think the lead could use a little work. Maybe another layer or two to make it a little thicker. The riff needs a little variation, too. I think the track as a whole needs a little work. There isn't a lot of energy to it and there's no real climax. Also, I would take the "unsigned" part out of the title. Unless a label is posting the track, it's generally safe to assume that it's unsigned. To me, it just looks pushy and a tad bit arrogant.
Alert moderator
|
_firefly_
New Member
United Kingdom
40 posts Joined: Apr, 2006
|
Posted - 2011/03/18 : 00:32:59
While we all have our own preferences and your opinions/feedback regarding the actual track is valid as thats the point of this thread, calling someone arrogant for letting people know his track is unsigned makes me confused. Are you just deliberately being negative for the sake of it?
Alert moderator
|
H3RO
Junior Member
United States
145 posts Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2011/03/18 : 04:18:47
No, but if he's looking to get signed, there is unfortunately more to it than just music. You need an image. To me, having "unsigned" in the title of the demo looks unprofessional. I have no doubts that he/she is a very nice and respectable person and by no means to I think they're arrogant. I merely meant it comes off as a tad bit arrogant, which I believe is what I said.
Alert moderator
|