Author |
Thread |
|
The drunken scotsman
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,486 posts Joined: Dec, 2011
|
Posted - 2019/09/12 : 19:38:48
Funnily enough there was a programme on last night which explained the way the towers fell. It was likely the burning aluminium from both planes mixing with water and other substances, thereby causing the explosions that were heard moments before the towers collapsed. I don?t think the official report picked up on that which probably has added weight to the conspiracies. Its all very well that structural engineers have commented about the way the towers fell but we haven?t ever seen anything on this scale involving large buildings burning away with jumbo jets lodged inside them.
An entire demolitions team would have had to have been rigging up wiring and explosives inside some of the busiest office buildings in the US for days if not weeks and no one saw them and queried it? No one who was involved in that small part of it has broken cover in almost 20 years?
That one task would have required the silence of thousands of people. To pull the whole thing off, with a nod to many of the theories, would have required the cooperation of (amongst others) politicians, federal employees, all branches of the military, airport security, air traffic control, aviation engineers......
Why go to all that effort in the first place? Surely 2 planes crashing into the worlds most iconic buildings in a blatant act of terrorism would be enough to get the message across without making the buildings collapse?
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2019/09/12 : 21:12:07
quote: Originally posted by The drunken scotsman:
Funnily enough there was a programme on last night which explained the way the towers fell. It was likely the burning aluminium from both planes mixing with water and other substances, thereby causing the explosions that were heard moments before the towers collapsed. I don?t think the official report picked up on that which probably has added weight to the conspiracies. Its all very well that structural engineers have commented about the way the towers fell but we haven?t ever seen anything on this scale involving large buildings burning away with jumbo jets lodged inside them.
An entire demolitions team would have had to have been rigging up wiring and explosives inside some of the busiest office buildings in the US for days if not weeks and no one saw them and queried it? No one who was involved in that small part of it has broken cover in almost 20 years?
That one task would have required the silence of thousands of people. To pull the whole thing off, with a nod to many of the theories, would have required the cooperation of (amongst others) politicians, federal employees, all branches of the military, airport security, air traffic control, aviation engineers......
Why go to all that effort in the first place? Surely 2 planes crashing into the worlds most iconic buildings in a blatant act of terrorism would be enough to get the message across without making the buildings collapse?
This. Exactly.
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
LeVzi
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
944 posts Joined: Feb, 2019
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 05:02:07
quote: Originally posted by Smoogie:
quote: Originally posted by LeVzi:
There were people rejoicing, in the UK, and that makes me sick to my stomach. I won't go into detail as i'm sure it would trigger some snowflakes here.
I never saw anyone rejoicing in the UK. I know that the Guardian ran a nasty piece on it but they have since backtracked on it. In Britain we have great sympathy
you just said you were 14, so you'd hardly be exposed to that. My mate was working in a factory that day, with men from a certain ethnicity who were happy about it, and showed that. I've since heard stuff myself to that effect.
Alert moderator
|
LeVzi
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
944 posts Joined: Feb, 2019
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 05:03:39
quote: Originally posted by The drunken scotsman:
Funnily enough there was a programme on last night which explained the way the towers fell. It was likely the burning aluminium from both planes mixing with water and other substances, thereby causing the explosions that were heard moments before the towers collapsed. I don?t think the official report picked up on that which probably has added weight to the conspiracies. Its all very well that structural engineers have commented about the way the towers fell but we haven?t ever seen anything on this scale involving large buildings burning away with jumbo jets lodged inside them.
An entire demolitions team would have had to have been rigging up wiring and explosives inside some of the busiest office buildings in the US for days if not weeks and no one saw them and queried it? No one who was involved in that small part of it has broken cover in almost 20 years?
That one task would have required the silence of thousands of people. To pull the whole thing off, with a nod to many of the theories, would have required the cooperation of (amongst others) politicians, federal employees, all branches of the military, airport security, air traffic control, aviation engineers......
Why go to all that effort in the first place? Surely 2 planes crashing into the worlds most iconic buildings in a blatant act of terrorism would be enough to get the message across without making the buildings collapse?
So why did building 3 collapse ?
Alert moderator
|
Smoogie
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,503 posts Joined: Mar, 2006
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 07:21:34
quote: Originally posted by LeVzi:
quote: Originally posted by Smoogie:
quote: Originally posted by LeVzi:
There were people rejoicing, in the UK, and that makes me sick to my stomach. I won't go into detail as i'm sure it would trigger some snowflakes here.
I never saw anyone rejoicing in the UK. I know that the Guardian ran a nasty piece on it but they have since backtracked on it. In Britain we have great sympathy
you just said you were 14, so you'd hardly be exposed to that. My mate was working in a factory that day, with men from a certain ethnicity who were happy about it, and showed that. I've since heard stuff myself to that effect.
I only heard about what the Garbage said quite a few years later. There was a worrying lot of sneering coming from the left and a 'few others'
__________________________________
.
Alert moderator
|
The drunken scotsman
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,486 posts Joined: Dec, 2011
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 07:27:33
Why dont you tell me why you think building 3 collapsed? See my post again. How many professionals with no conscience would have had to be involved in this murderous act?
Ill concede that, on the face of it, it looks suspect but for all of these theories there is a logical explanation which is much more believable than the actions which would have needed to occur for there to be something more sinister at play. In this case, the logical explanation is that it was in the vicinity of 2 of the worlds biggest skyscrapers which happened to crash down. This is far more believable than anything else Ive heard. There is further evidence out there but most people buying into the theories arent interested in looking at it.
Alert moderator
|
Triquatra
Moderator
United Kingdom
12,635 posts Joined: Nov, 2003
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 08:13:17
I don't think it's that suspcious to be honest. The whole thing wreaks of human incompetence, error and panic.
I do find it pretty funny that people believe that the Bush administration were so wickedly intelligent and clever as to keep something so far-reaching, under wraps, even from wikileaks...and everyone involved, despite being a country so well known for chasing the money/fame, staying utterly, stone cold silent.
or is it more likely that third hand reporting issues that arose on the day were down to incompetence and panic?
Building 3 has a perfectly reasonable explanation, but I guess the entirety of the NIST were someone 'payed off' too, haha.
__________________________________
Triquatra/Bee Trax/Cuttlefish
http://www.hardcoreunderground.co.uk/ - http://CLSM.net -
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 10:05:30
There HAS to be an alternative theory for everything these days.
As soon as it happens -
'False flag'
'Inside job'
'What aren't they telling us'
'If you believe the official line you're a Sheep, government shill etc etc'
Oh bore off!
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
Samination
Advanced Member
Sweden
13,170 posts Joined: Jul, 2004
195 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 10:18:52
quote: Originally posted by Triquatra:
I don't think it's that suspcious to be honest. The whole thing wreaks of human incompetence, error and panic.
I do find it pretty funny that people believe that the Bush administration were so wickedly intelligent and clever as to keep something so far-reaching, under wraps, even from wikileaks...and everyone involved, despite being a country so well known for chasing the money/fame, staying utterly, stone cold silent.
or is it more likely that third hand reporting issues that arose on the day were down to incompetence and panic?
Building 3 has a perfectly reasonable explanation, but I guess the entirety of the NIST were someone 'payed off' too, haha.
Wikileaks has already proven themselves being on Russia/GoP's side anyways
__________________________________
---------------------------------------------
Samination, Swedish Hardcore DJ
Happy, UK Hardcore, Freeform, Makina and Gabber
http://samination.se/ ---------------------------------------------
Alert moderator
|
The drunken scotsman
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,486 posts Joined: Dec, 2011
|
Posted - 2019/09/13 : 16:09:45
My theory is that Bin Laden was frustrated with the state of the UK Hardcore scene at that point and was simply venting. It seemed to work well as we did see a major resurgence shortly after.
Alert moderator
|
LeVzi
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
944 posts Joined: Feb, 2019
|
Posted - 2019/09/14 : 07:59:53
quote: Originally posted by The drunken scotsman:
Why dont you tell me why you think building 3 collapsed? See my post again. How many professionals with no conscience would have had to be involved in this murderous act?
Ill concede that, on the face of it, it looks suspect but for all of these theories there is a logical explanation which is much more believable than the actions which would have needed to occur for there to be something more sinister at play. In this case, the logical explanation is that it was in the vicinity of 2 of the worlds biggest skyscrapers which happened to crash down. This is far more believable than anything else Ive heard. There is further evidence out there but most people buying into the theories arent interested in looking at it.
I don't want to believe that it was an inside job, but look at where building 3 was in comparison to the other two, and it's hard to understand, but hey i'm no structual engineer.
Bottom line is, for me, 2 air planes fresh in the air, full of kerosine, hit 2 buildings, and they eventually collapse, none of which was expected to happen.
Al Queada claimed they organised it. THat's good enough for me.
Alert moderator
|
Si Thompson
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,420 posts Joined: Mar, 2016
|
Posted - 2019/09/16 : 17:16:32
__________________________________
Si Thompson
https://soundcloud.com/si-thompson The Rave Music Archive https://soundcloud.com/the_rave_music_archive https://www.youtube.com/c/theravemusicarchive Kool Katz Digital https://soundcloud.com/kool-katz-digital
Alert moderator
|
|